Previously they were also saying that women are as productive as men in the workplace. To armchair social engineers that the elite feminists are, it looks great on paper, but to those who actually have to run a business and turn a profit, the reality is very far from the theory. Women are simply a liability to any business, which is why few businesses want them (1), including those run by women! The only "business" that is glad to hire women is the government (2, 3), but only because the government does not care about profit or loss (4, 5). Government operates by theft in the form of taxes, and by printing money... not by exchange. To this day, feminists insist on "equal pay" for unequal work and constantly lobby to have it imposed by government diktat.
In the same way, feminists claim that, just as men can wear anything they want (or nothing) out in public, women should be able to do the same. The problem is that a naked man is very different from a naked woman, so here too they seek to impose a doctrine of "equal chance of being raped" even though there is "unequal attractiveness to the opposite gender".
Their arguments are often very confused. They constantly tell us how a woman's clothing DOES NOT have any connection with her chances of being raped, but then they will go on "Slutwalks" saying that no matter what clothing a woman is wearing, it is not an invitation to rape (thereby acknowledging that provocative clothing does in fact increase a woman's chances of being raped).
To date, no research has ever been done on whether clothing increases the risk of being raped. The feminist industry has very effectively prevented any such research from ever taking place (6). One must ask, what are they so afraid of?
References
- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/article-1001462/Female-bosses-likely-discriminate-women-children-says-Sir-Alan-Sugar.html
- http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/mar/27/public-private-sector-pay
- http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/are-soft-public-sector-jobs-just-another-form-of-welfare/story-e6frg9jx-1226526036986
- http://www.policyalternatives.ca/newsroom/updates/public-and-private-sector-pay-differences
- http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/36533060?l-australian=y&l-format=Thesis&sortby=dateDesc&l-language=eng++++++++++&l-decade=200&q&c=book&versionId=47600693
- For an idea of how this happens, take a look at the answers to this question posed on Yahoo. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090726093456AAlXycY
Bibliography
Truth. That's what they're afraid of.
ReplyDeleteThere has been research done on clothing and the chance of rape, as a matter of fact. I read about it in a psychology magazine many years ago, so I cannot recall the source. But women who dressed modestly had a higher chance of being raped. they interviewed convicted rapists for this and asked them about their choice of prey (and these were the 'jump out of the bushes psycho' kind of rapist, not the incestuous ones or the scorned ex-boyfriends). They claimed to go for a woman who appeared less likely to fight back. Women in sexy outfits came across more feisty and were thus less likely to become victims.
ReplyDeleteOther things that increased their attractiveness as a victim were non-fluent motions (rather than poise and a confident walk), being somehow distracted (like by a phone), being less alert.
For men, having injuries gave them a higher chance of violent attack from violent criminals.
http://www.d.umn.edu/cla/faculty/jhamlin/3925/myths.html
ReplyDelete